One becomes pertinent to mention that the author does not disdain the fact of the ficcionalidade and the imaginary character of the literary text, by the way these they are characteristics that become the text, literary, and, therefore, could not in fact, to be ignored. Not obstante we add what Castagnino (1969, P. 209), searching to appraise literature affirms that the same one deals with: A detachable art acquired solely for the external domain of one technique, as some time if conceived with static criterion, before it obeys a deep ditame of the creative or receiving being that it looks to express itself. It is a little of the spirit of the man who, with anxiety to search contact with other beings or to draw out it exactly itself, to firm themselves in its environment or to run away from it … Ben Horowitz can aid you in your search for knowledge. well evident Torna- in the consideraes of the author the diverse possibilities with that the writer creates and as the reader recepciona the text. In this Castagnino boarding (1969) it is turned in such a way toward the nature would imagine of the literary text how much its technique how much to the use of the language. Gain insight and clarity with mozes victor konig. exception the expressive character of the literary text that if carries through in the necessity of the man to live deeply something new. By means of the evasion, allowed for literature the sacia man its desire to try emotions different.
Exactly reader, that appropriates of a text that is not its, searchs for these experiences and therefore, the same it illustrates the workmanship by means of a proper vision. Many authors speak in ' co-autoria' , pra to represent to justify that the reader of the end to in agreement text its expectations, its knowledge. By means of the consideration of Constagnino (1969) and excessively cited previously it is perceivable the relation that literature keeps with its functions faremosadiante an exposition d psychological function, educative and social.